Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
Análisis de la ley de comunicación y sus efectos en la libertad de expresión en los medios de comunicación ecuatoriano diciembre 2019
dc.contributor.advisor | Rodriguez Ponce, Franklin | |
dc.contributor.author | Erazo Marquez, Barbara Affuth | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-15T15:55:28Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-15T15:55:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dspace.utb.edu.ec/handle/49000/8803 | |
dc.description | This case study is an analysis of the regulations given in 2019 to the Organic Law of Communication in order to know whether or not it provides guarantees to free expression and the exchange of information or opinion, this law has generated much controversy Since its inception in June 2013, in order to regulate the media, for five years the supervisory body SUPERCOM issued fines and sanctions to various media and journalists who exercised this right. For the respective analysis, an explanatory descriptive research will be used, which will allow the theoretical argumentation of the laws and statutes exposed to correction in 2019, within which surveys will also be carried out to students of the Social Communication Career of the Technical University of Babahoyo in order to know their opinion on the relationship between the LOC and freedom of expression. It is concluded that the Organic Law of Communication in Ecuador does not provide the necessary guarantees to journalists, this due to the sanctions or fines and the deontological standards which ensure the veracity of the information but sometimes use prior censorship, which does not It is stipulated within the CDIH coercing the right to freedom of expression, for its part it was also known that among those surveyed, mention was made of independent journalism using social networks as a means for free opinion for the freedom of the rules that are more affordable and do not represent coercion. | es_ES |
dc.description | This case study is an analysis of the regulations given in 2019 to the Organic Law of Communication in order to know whether or not it provides guarantees to free expression and the exchange of information or opinion, this law has generated much controversy Since its inception in June 2013, in order to regulate the media, for five years the supervisory body SUPERCOM issued fines and sanctions to various media and journalists who exercised this right. For the respective analysis, an explanatory descriptive research will be used, which will allow the theoretical argumentation of the laws and statutes exposed to correction in 2019, within which surveys will also be carried out to students of the Social Communication Career of the Technical University of Babahoyo in order to know their opinion on the relationship between the LOC and freedom of expression. It is concluded that the Organic Law of Communication in Ecuador does not provide the necessary guarantees to journalists, this due to the sanctions or fines and the deontological standards which ensure the veracity of the information but sometimes use prior censorship, which does not It is stipulated within the CDIH coercing the right to freedom of expression, for its part it was also known that among those surveyed, mention was made of independent journalism using social networks as a means for free opinion for the freedom of the rules that are more affordable and do not represent coercion. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | El presente caso de estudio es un análisis de las regulaciones dadas en el 2019 a la Ley Orgánica de Comunicación con el fin de conocer si presta o no las garantías a la libre expresión y al intercambio de información u opinión, esta ley ha generado mucho controversia desde su instauración en junio del 2013, con la finalidad de regular los medios de comunicación, es así que durante cinco años el organismo veedor SUPERCOM realizó multas y sanciones a diversos medios y periodistas que ejercían este derecho. Para el análisis respectivo se empleará una investigación descriptiva explicativa, la mismas que permitirá la argumentación teórica de las leyes y estatutos expuestos a corrección en el 2019, dentro de lo cual también se realizará encuestas a estudiantes de la Carrera de Comunicación social de la Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo con la finalidad de conocer su opinión sobre la relación que tiene la LOC y la libertad de expresión. Se concluye que la Ley Orgánica de Comunicación en el Ecuador no presta las garantías necesarias a los periodistas, esto debido a las sanciones o multas y a las normas deontológicas las cuales aseguran la veracidad de la información pero en ocasiones utilizan una censura previa, lo cual no se encuentra estipulado dentro del CDIH coactando el derecho a la libertad de expresión, por su parte también se pudo conocer que entre los encuestados se hizo mención del periodismo independiente utilizando a las redes sociales como un medio para la libre opinión por la libertad de las normas comunitarias que son más exequibles y no representan una coacción. | es_ES |
dc.format.extent | 29 p. | es_ES |
dc.language.iso | es | es_ES |
dc.publisher | BABAHOYO: UTB, 2020 | es_ES |
dc.rights | Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Ecuador | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ec/ | * |
dc.subject | Libertad de expresión | es_ES |
dc.subject | Ley Orgánica de Comunicación | es_ES |
dc.subject | Normas Comunitarias | es_ES |
dc.subject | Periodistas | es_ES |
dc.title | Análisis de la ley de comunicación y sus efectos en la libertad de expresión en los medios de comunicación ecuatoriano diciembre 2019 | es_ES |
dc.type | bachelorThesis | es_ES |